<p style="font-size: 12px;color:#aaa;">版权引用:<a href="https://www.behance.net/gallery/53389677/FUTURE-PROOF-new-flexibilityadaptive-reuse"><span style="font-size: 12px;color:black;">“My thesis proposes a new understanding of flexibility in architecture. It investigates reasons for a generic and dull spatial expression of the majority of contemporary buildings.Nowadays, technology and lifestyle are changing so fast that buildings need to accommodate shifting functions. Unfortunately, in pursuit of flexibility, architects design featureless “boxes” which lack intentionality. Contemporary architects have completely cut themselves off from the rich legacy of pre-modern architecture. As a result, a shallow interpretation of modernism sets a standard of flexibility. My point is to prove that in order to be flexible a building doesn’t have to be a free-plan, post-and-beam construction.I want to demonstrate that flexible architecture can have excellent quality and be inhabited by a language of familiar forms. I’m proving it by investigating spatial patterns and form languages in historical buildings. Selected historical examples are analyzed in terms of spatial q......”</span> </a>由 <a href=""><span style="font-size: 12px;color:black;"></span></a> 授权许可 <span><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.zh" target="_blank" style="font-size: 12px;color:black;">Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial 4.0 International<img src="" style="display: inline-block;height: 16px;width: auto;"></a></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 12px;color:#aaa;">版权引用:<a href="https://www.behance.net/gallery/53389677/FUTURE-PROOF-new-flexibilityadaptive-reuse"><span style="font-size: 12px;color:black;">“My thesis proposes a new understanding of flexibility in architecture. It investigates reasons for a generic and dull spatial expression of the majority of contemporary buildings.Nowadays, technology and lifestyle are changing so fast that buildings need to accommodate shifting functions. Unfortunately, in pursuit of flexibility, architects design featureless “boxes” which lack intentionality. Contemporary architects have completely cut themselves off from the rich legacy of pre-modern architecture. As a result, a shallow interpretation of modernism sets a standard of flexibility. My point is to prove that in order to be flexible a building doesn’t have to be a free-plan, post-and-beam construction.I want to demonstrate that flexible architecture can have excellent quality and be inhabited by a language of familiar forms. I’m proving it by investigating spatial patterns and form languages in historical buildings. Selected historical examples are analyzed in terms of spatial q......”</span> </a>由 <a href=""><span style="font-size: 12px;color:black;"></span></a> 授权许可 <span><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.zh" target="_blank" style="font-size: 12px;color:black;">Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial 4.0 International<img src="" style="display: inline-block;height: 16px;width: auto;"></a></span></p>